Opened 6 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#1484147 closed Bugs (duplicate)
Message-ID Field rfc2822
| Reported by: | xsandro | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | 5 | Milestone: | 0.1.1 |
| Component: | Core functionality | Version: | 0.1-beta2 |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | message-id, rfc2822 |
| Cc: |
Description
I have a small question. As described in RFC 2822 the whole content of the message-id field, including comments, should be sent back in the "In-Reply-To:" field and I think
that RoundCube is discarding the comments.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by estadtherr
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by xsandro
Hi,
Sorry for the delay!
Let me provide an example:
1-) When I send an e-mail from Gmail to my personal e-mail address:
Return-Path: <alessandro.martins@…>
X-Original-To: alessandro@…
Delivered-To: alessandro@…
Received-SPF: pass (alpha.martins.eng.br: domain of alessandro.martins@… designates 66.249.82.236 as permitted sender)
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236])
by alpha.martins.eng.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA788084
for <alessandro@…>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t14so1452816wxc
for <alessandro@…>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=Y2BM/212lIli0RO9DHjntu4eYn1lVXNhCB339tjhtYQbHQC8aL5vlWV21O6nuFbZOzZPTlq6zoEtMt3OTiY6K1aIguxA89s+KUv13o0tzjPtKwW2/PyBLQj7MhcLGi40aLTMhBQZ69QqNFXy0/0XS/2AAJOWl0a1dweJ+tIqk=
DomainKey?-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=UTyYzps/M9I2cDLM9ETBcAbGiMw7FwzsbA8Y73Wvpd+to6BbHMM6K+DH/zJPqtqjcUNGHjvcMaInRLu8q3eU3qfV1TSX5eUxlL6mrNS7Tm5tVlPzNSDB2glTccvukoAz8ZD/vt6AgtqcdNHEqMZWme0R3PIEP5uzcUEcp7cb6vE=
Received: by 10.90.75.10 with SMTP id x10mr4632587aga.1174333372894;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.149.16 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <248709750703191242o7529153fw8666fa0860a36171@…>
(sfid-H20070319-154252-+024.99-1@…)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:42:52 -0300
From: "Alessandro Fernandes Martins" <alessandro.martins@…>
To: "Alessandro Fernandes Martins" <alessandro@…>
Subject: Teste
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-OSBF-Lua-Score: 24.99/0.00 [H] (v2.0.2, Spamfilter v2.0)
References: <sfid-H20070319-154252-+024.99-1@…>
2-) When I replied from my personal account to gmail:
Delivered-To: alessandro.martins@…
Received: by 10.114.149.16 with SMTP id w16cs934257wad;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.55.19 with SMTP id d19mr4623925aga.1174333689825;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <alessandro@…>
Received: from alpha.martins.eng.br (alpha.martins.eng.br [71.6.194.232])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 74si8321744wra.2007.03.19.12.48.09;
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of alessandro@… designates 71.6.194.232 as permitted sender)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by alpha.martins.eng.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CDD8084
for <alessandro.martins@…>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:48:07 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:48:07 -0400
From: Alessandro Fernandes Martins <alessandro@…>
To: Alessandro Fernandes Martins <alessandro.martins@…>
Subject: Re: Teste
In-Reply-To: <248709750703191242o7529153fw8666fa0860a36171@…>
Message-Id: <20070319194807.34CDD8084@…>
(sfid-H20070319-154252-+024.99-1@…)
References: <248709750703191242o7529153fw8666fa0860a36171@…>
(sfid-H20070319-154252-+024.99-1@…)
Message-ID: <70befb762650635ca7877ba4eb3e509b@localhost>
X-Sender: alessandro@…
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:42:52 -0300, "Alessandro Fernandes Martins" <alessandro.martins@…> wrote:
--
Alessandro Martins
http://www.martins.eng.br
--
Alessandro Martins
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by seansan
- Milestone set to 0.1.1
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from new to closed
- Summary changed from Message-ID Field to Message-ID Field rfc2822

Can you provide an example of a Message-ID field whose value was not propagated correctly?